Politicians do God very badly: I really wish they’d give it up

By and large, when clerics turn to politics, they sound naive. But when politicians turn to religion, they sound either cynical or dangerous; indeed, usually both. In David Cameron’s case, the dangers he poses have little to do with religion, and everything to do with his political and class philosophy. He merely likes to sprinkle a bit of bible dust around the place to perk it all up a bit, just as a chef might add a touch of chilli powder to an otherwise pedestrian dish.

Thus the Prime Minister’s religious excursion on the back of the 400th anniversary of the King James Bible does not make the hairs on the back of one’s neck stand up in the way that those creepy fundamentalist Republicans do. I don’t worry that we’ll soon be banning evolution from the classroom, nor demonising gay people on the basis of selective quotation and poor biblical exegesis. No-one looking at or listening to Mr Cameron would ever make the mistake of thinking that he actually believed any of that stuff, still less practised it.

Yet in his distinctively British way, he played a more subtle, yet perhaps even more insidious, hand. He weaved a mythology every bit as misleading and corrupting as any fire-brand, mouth-frothing senator from the Southern USA. He located the Bible as a sort of comfortable, and comforting, nostalgic gloss on Britishness. The King James Version emerged as Cameron’s warm beer and village cricket, a mythical England (not even  Britain if truth be told) as chocolate box, darling buds of May costume drama.

Those films and television series that Britain is so famous for, and so good at producing, that evoke that kind of idyllic, old-fashioned, nostalgic sense of ourselves are indeed seductive. The only thing wrong with the images they create is that they’re not true now, and they never were. The translation of the Bible into English was not some cosy high water mark of Britishness. It was a bloody and controversial, subversive act that shook the society to its foundations. To present that, of all things, as a symbol of British social harmony is as breathtakingly ahistorical as it is theologically inept.

This Prime Minister presides over the largest net transfer of wealth from the very poorest to the very richest that we’ve seen for generations. There is no interpretation of the Bible, old testament or new, that gives authority to such a process. Rather than using the Bible as a sort of anodyne guarantee of us all being in it together, Mr Cameron should try reading it. He might learn something.


2 thoughts on “Politicians do God very badly: I really wish they’d give it up

  1. This version was produced by committee and deeply political, part of the removal of the Catholic tradition and the locking in of the church to the state.
    Your piece is very good, but I fear that this is an assertion of business as usual for both the Anglican church and its godfather, the Crown.
    It makes me wince every time I hear the line about God protect the Queen, as if she needs any special divine intervention, in your church services.
    The last time I entered a C of E church I was immediately asked politely what I wanted. There was an exhibition about the King James bible in fact and there was no where to sit or knell. And that was in the Church Commissioners heartland near Hyde Park. I came in because it was a Christian church and do not want to be asked why, nor given a biased history lesson.

    • Thanks for your comment, and I take your critical points about Anglicanism. But probably what Christians can least afford is to start playing a “my church is better than your church” game. All the churches have at least as much to be ashamed of as they have to be proud of. Almost certainly more. Indeed, their only claim for pride is that they have at least kept the Gospel alive to our day. Mediaeval Catholicism perhaps gives more cause for wincing even than gratuitous royalist responses at Evensong in an Anglican church!

      Our houses are made of such fragile glass that we really shouldn’t even think of playing with stones.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s